Bottle bills, extended producer responsibility OK by plastics association leaders

Mar 19, 2024

Washington — In a sign of the long-term shift in plastics industry positions on environmental legislation, the head of the Plastics Industry Association told a Senate hearing Dec. 15 it supports recycled-content requirements, extended producer responsibility and a national bottle bill.

Matt Seaholm, president and CEO of the Washington-based trade group, told a hearing of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee the industry sees properly designed laws like those as important to improve the poor performance of plastics recycling.

"The industry has come to a point of accepting a fee on products in order to fund recycling infrastructure because at the heart of the matter ... the infrastructure has simply not kept up, and that's what we have to fund," he told the hearing, referring to extended producer responsibility laws.

The association would also be OK with laws mandating recycled content in plastic products and a national bottle bill, Seaholm said, in response to a question from Sen. Jeff Merkley, D-Ore., who has introduced national bottle bills.

"There's no doubt that bottle bills work, bottle deposits work; we've seen it," Seaholm said. "Would the industry support a bottle bill, crafted correctly? I think it would certainly be open to that on a national scale, again, crafted correctly."

Another witness at the hearing, Judith Enck, head of the environmental group Beyond Plastics, said she thought "we may have heard breaking news from Mr. Seaholm on a national bottle bill."

"Having the plastics industry support a national bottle bill and getting the details right would be really helpful," she said. "We need a national bottle bill. If you just look at PET plastic beverage bottles, in the 10 states that have bottle bills, the PET recycling rate is 63 percent. Without deposits, it's only 17 percent."

At the hearing, Merkley had been pressing Seaholm on his group's legislative positions, saying that Oregon recycles about 90 percent of the containers in its bottle bill and calling it one of the easier steps that could be taken to help recycling because bottle bills produce a cleaner, more valuable stream of materials.

Seaholm's comments in favor of EPR, recycled-content mandates and bottle bills are not entirely new for the industry, but they do indicate how the plastics sector's public positions have shifted a lot in the last few years.

Other plastics groups have endorsed similar ideas. The American Chemistry Council in 2021 released a five-point federal plan that included support for EPR and recycled-content mandates, and the National Association for PET Container Resources came out with a low-key announcement in 2020 endorsing bottle bills.

But although 10 states passed bottle bills in the 1970s and 1980s, it's proven very difficult for new ones to pass because they often face significant opposition from the beverage and grocery industries.

Plastics companies have sometimes not been major players in bottle bill debates, and instead have followed their customer groups in beverage and retail industries in opposing them. But that opposition has also been softening.

In 2020, Merkley introduced national bottle bill legislation modeled on Oregon's program. He's also a key sponsor of the Break Free From Plastic Pollution Act, which has recycled-content requirements and EPR provisions.

Seaholm told Merkley that industry could support well-designed recycled-content laws as a way to help stabilize the system.

"Recycled-content requirements, done reasonably, actually can help spur investment in the infrastructure side of things because the demand is guaranteed to be there," Seaholm said.

The two-hour hearing ranged widely over both recycling topics and the potential health impacts of chemicals used in plastics.

Merkley, who chaired the hearing as part of his role heading up the EPW's subcommittee tasked with waste issues, kicked it off by talking about microscopic pieces of plastic that have been widely detected in people — in breast milk and baby feces — and in the environment, including in remote Arctic regions.

"What we know is that plastics are loaded with thousands of chemicals, deep in our lungs, in our breast milk, in our consumption," he said. "We don't really understand all the effects, but it's certainly a cause for concern."

One witness at the hearing, John Peterson "Pete" Myers, founder and CEO of Environmental Health Sciences and an adjunct professor of chemistry at Carnegie Mellon University, said there's growing evidence of environmental and human health harm from chemicals that leach out of plastics.

"We are exposed to hundreds of endocrine-disrupting chemicals throughout our lives, including from plastics," he said. "Many chemicals leaching out of plastics are EDCs, and that links them to a wide array of today's epidemics of noncommunicable diseases like breast cancer, prostate cancer, testicular cancer, infertility, immune disorders and brain impediments."

But other senators and industry witnesses said plastics were essential materials to modern life.

The subcommittee's ranking Republican, Mississippi Sen. Roger Wicker, urged other senators to remember how plastics have been pivotal for public health and other advancements.

But he also said more needed to be done to improve access to recycling, particularly in rural areas.

At the hearing, Seaholm echoed those points, saying the industry, which employs about 1 million people in the United States, is making substantial investments in recycling.

"Plastic has become a preferred material in most applications because it uses the least number of resources to manufacture and transport, as well as providing greater performance," Seaholm said. "However, we must also acknowledge that the incredible innovations in plastics materials and products have outpaced our ability to recycle them because infrastructure has not kept up."

He said plastics recycling companies are constantly telling his association they need more plastics materials for recycling but can't get enough supply.

Enck, though, urged senators to look at ways to reduce plastics production, saying that too many single-use materials were not necessary. She said government policy should encourage reusable packaging and that while some plastics uses are needed, there's too much waste and environmental pollution.

"I want to go on record by saying that there are some uses of plastic, but we don't see medical waste hanging from trees," she said. "Cars are more efficient if they have some plastic, making them lighter. But I don't see car bumpers in my local park. I see a lot of single-use plastics."

She said the many kinds of plastics makes it harder to build effective recycling infrastructure for them and said consumers should only try to recycle plastic bottles labeled with the resin identification code No. 1, for PET, or No. 2, for high density polyethylene.

"Plastic recycling is a failure," she said. "You really should only put No. 1 and No. 2 into your recycling bin. That leaves the majority of plastics as nonrecyclable."

Do you have an opinion about this story? Do you have some thoughts you'd like to share with our readers? Plastics News would love to hear from you. Email your letter to Editor at [email protected]

Please enter a valid email address.

Please enter your email address.

Please verify captcha.

Please select at least one newsletter to subscribe.

View the discussion thread.